Accredited by
American Zoo & Aquarium
Association
Alliance of Marine Mammal
Parks & Aquariums
Canadian Association of
Zoos and Aquariums |
History of
Cetaceans at the Aquarium
From
the rise and fall of industrial whaling, to the evolving struggle
to conserve species at risk, human beings and cetaceans have
had a long and varied relationship. Over the last 50 years,
in particular, our understanding of cetaceans has changed
remarkably.
|
|
| The
Vancouver Aquarium opened in 1956. Even in its early days the
focus was very much on marine research. For the first eight
years most of the animals housed and studied were fish. Animals
that could not be kept were modelled and displayed. In 1964
the Aquarium commissioned Samuel Burich, a sculptor and commercial
fisherman, to make a life-size model of a killer whale. He and
another commercial fisherman, Joe Bauer, went out to kill a
killer whale and bring it back to Vancouver. |
 |
|
|
|
 |
The whale was harpooned, but did not die. Learning of this,
Murray A. Newman, the Aquarium’s first director, instructed
the pair to bring the whale back to Vancouver alive. Great
care was taken so that the whale, referred to as Moby Doll
would not be further harmed. Indeed, it quite passively followed
the boat on the end of a line all the way across the Strait.
Here, the whale survived in captivity for three months. This
event caught the attention of international media; the whole
world watched and attitudes towards killer whales began to
change.
|
Previously
killer whales were considered vicious, fearsome killers. Wildlife
managers believed that predators like these needed to be culled
to maintain harvestable populations of fish. To this end,
a Browning fifty-calibre machine gun, that was fortunately
never used, was mounted at Seymour Narrows. But Moby Doll
(who turned out to be a male), was docile, even friendly.
What’s more, he made it clear that killer whales could
be housed in a safe manner and were easily trained. The public’s
interest was galvanised, and soon aquariums around the world
were clamouring for them.
By
the following year killer whales were fetching top dollar
on the international market. So when a pair of fishermen accidentally
caught two killer whales in Warrior Cove, south of Namu, they
held on to them expecting to get rich. The younger whale escaped
but Ted Griffith of the Seattle Aquarium flew up immediately
and bought the second, a mature bull. Remarkably, up to 40
whales remained near the whale’s pen until he was taken
away. In particular, a large cow and two calves stayed within
several feet of the bull. At this time, no one imagined that
whales were capable of developing such strong bonds. |

Moby
Doll at the Burrard Drydocks. |
|

Hyak
being lowered into a pool at the
at
the Vancouver Aquarium. |
In
1967 a killer whale named Walter, which had been caught off
the Washington coast, was brought to Vancouver for the annual
Boat Show. The whale was purchased by the Aquarium and, when
it was realized that he was a she, renamed Skana. Skana soon
became the Aquarium’s star attraction.
The
following year a group of whales were caught in Pender Harbour.
A small male originally called Peanuts and later named Hyak
was purchased and brought to the Aquarium. Hyak would be Skana’s
companion until her death in 1980. |
| In
1967, having just completed his Ph.D. in psychology at UCLA,
Dr. Paul Spong came to Vancouver to work with UBC and the
Vancouver Aquarium on cetacean cognition. His early research
focussed on the Aquarium’s two Pacific white-sided dolphins,
Diana and Splasher. He began basic studies in vision and perception
here that quickly yielded an understanding of how dolphins
see and, perhaps more importantly, how quickly they learn..
The next step seemed obvious, which was to apply a similar
series of tests to the Aquarium’s killer whale, Skana. |

|

Dr.
Paul Spong testing the visual acuity of
an
Aquarium dolphin. |
Skana
proved to be an incredibly good student. Seventy-two trials
per day were performed and she responded remarkably well.
Skana would perform a behaviour and Dr. Spong would reward
her with a fish. Then one day something unusual happened.
She got one wrong. This was unusual but not unheard of. However,
she began to consistently do the opposite of what the researchers
had come to expect. The question of motivation arose. Perhaps
a small fish to a large whale was not sufficient motivation.
So in order to introduce something novel to her environment,
Dr. Spong and his assistant Don White began to introduce sounds
by means of an underwater speaker.
Skana
reacted very favourably to the new stimulus. The researchers
began experimenting with a variety of different sounds, from
simple waveform generators to reproductions of classical music.
This last trial produced astonishing results. Skana began
to race around the pool and perform leaps out of the water.
This led to further studies in killer whale acoustics.
|
|
|
| Shortly
after this, our understanding of wild populations of killer
whales changed radically. It was believed that killer whales
existed in the thousands off the shores of British Columbia.
But a census taken in the early seventies and led by Fisheries
and Oceans Canada biologist Dr. Michael Bigg showed that at
most there were around 300 killer whales. This realisation meant
that capturing significant numbers of wild whales for use in
aquaria was not sustainable and by the mid-seventies this practice
was banned. |

|
 |
Dr.
Bigg and his research assistants Graeme Ellis and Ian MacAskie
continued to survey and photograph the killer whales along this
coast. As they did they came to notice distinct markings on
the backs and dorsal fins of the whales they were studying and
this led to the realisation that individuals could be identified
from photographs. By recognising particular individuals repeatedly
over numerous encounters, trends in association were noted.
These trends solidified into familial relationships and we began
to get some insight into killer whale social structure. |
| Up
until this time it was believed that there was just one type
of killer whale. Dr. Bigg and his colleagues began to observe
differences in fin shape and travel patterns that led them to
speculate that there were two distinct types of killer whales.
One group they considered “outcasts,” whales that
existed on the fringes of mainstream killer whale society. Later,
they realised that there were two distinct types of killer whales
sharing the same habitat but differing radically in diet, behaviour,
sounds and social system. This idea encountered some skepticism
in the scientific community for many years, but eventually proved
to be completely accurate. |
 |
| At
the time, Dr. Bigg’s primary task with Fisheries and Oceans
was to study northern fur seals, and he performed much of his
ground-breaking research on killer whales in his spare time.
His conviction that killer whales could be individually-identified
reliably from photographs and had a complex form of social organisation
was debated for years. |
|
|
|
|

|
In
the summer of 1975 Murray Newman asked a young university student
working at the Aquarium if he wanted to go to the Arctic on
a research expedition. John Ford leapt at the opportunity and
began a study of narwhals. His analysis of extensive acoustic
recordings of these whales formed the basis of his honours thesis
at UBC. He continued to do graduate work on cetaceans through
the late seventies and early eighties as a research associate
of the Aquarium, and in 1988 became our first Curator of Marine
Mammals. |
| During
his Ph.D. research, Dr. Ford’s attention switched to vocal
behaviour in killer whales. He observed that Skana and Hyak
had very different calls. After Skana died however, Hyak began
mimicking her. He would make either his original calls or ones
that sounded like her, depending on the context. In December
of 1980, two more killer whales, Bjossa and Finna, arrived from
Iceland and were introduced to the Aquarium. Finna, a male,
also began to make sounds that would alternately resemble Skana
or Hyak. Bjossa, however, a dominant female, would not. She
made her own calls exclusively for the duration of the other
whales’ lives. But, again, after the death of both Hyak
and Finna she began to use the calls of both of them. These
observations led Dr. Ford to study the vocal repertoire of wild
killer whales for his Ph.D. thesis. |
 |

An
example of a spectrogram of a killer whale vocalization.
Image
by Harald Yurk. |
When
Dr. Ford compared these calls to recordings made of different
groups of killer whales in the wild a picture began to emerge.
It seemed that different groups that traveled together shared
the same calls, and these were distinct from the calls of other
groups. Coupling this understanding with the emerging science
of photo-identification allowed researchers to elaborate on
our understanding of the social structure of different populations
of killer whales. Essentially, male and female killer whales
remain with their mothers for life. This creates what is known
as a matriline and is the fundamental unit of killer whale populations.
These matrilines tend to associate together into what is loosely
defined as a pod. All matrilines and pods that share related
vocal repertoires, or ‘dialects’, form what is known
as a clan. Different clans produce entirely different calls. |
|
|
| All
this knowledge was summarised in a book in 1987. Killer Whales
was written, published, and financed by Michael Bigg, John Ford,
, Graeme Ellis and Ken Balcomb (Center for Whale Research, Friday
Harbor, WA). It summarised all these developments for an increasingly
curious public. Attitudes had changed dramatically since the
early sixties when killer whales were viewed as fearful predators
and competitors. In the years since the publication of Killer
Whales, a huge whale-watching industry has developed and people
from all over the world come to see them. |
 |
 |
In
1992 Dr. Ford’s position at the Aquarium changed to Marine
Mammal Scientist, to allow him to concentrate on research full
time. This same year, Dr. Ford started the BC
Wild Killer Whale Adoption Program. The program allows members
of the public to “adopt” a wild killer whale by
pledging a certain amount of money per year. The funds generated
support the conservation of killer whales through research.
|
Another
project generated out of this ongoing research was the establishment
of permanent hydrophone stations along the B.C. coast. Now
that the dialects of individual matrilines could be recognized,
this technology allowed researchers to remotely monitor the
movements of killer whales. Hopefully as this project continues,
a network of such hydrophones will allow us to track where
the whales go in winter, a question that continues to perplex
researchers.
The
public’s interest in this project was phenomenal and
so it was arranged to broadcast the signal on a low-power
FM station known as ORCA FM. While ORCA FM can only be received
in the Johnstone Strait area of Vancouver Island, a similar
project called Orca Live operates
through the summers and broadcasts over the Internet. |
 |
|
|
New
studies are continually born out of this environment. Despite
the fact that there are no longer any killer whales at the Vancouver
Aquarium, graduate students at UBC continue to work closely
with researchers here on innovative projects in morphology,
acoustics, and predation in wild killer whale populations. Dr.
Ford moved from the Aquarium to head marine mammal research
for Fisheries and Oceans Canada at their Pacific Biological
Station in 2001. Dr. Lance Barrett-Lennard,
a former Ph.D. student of Dr. Ford’s, took over the position
and continues research on wild killer whale populations. Thus,
the tradition of killer whale research that began with Michael
Bigg in the early seventies continues to this day. And our understanding
of social structure and culture in killer whales has been taken
to the next level by incorporating studies of their genetics.
[link]
Without the understanding of killer whales that has developed
over the last 30 years, such triumphs as the much-publicized
reuniting of the calf killer whale Springer with her relatives
would not have been possible. |
|
|